tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post4811922406447489204..comments2024-01-24T13:11:53.844-05:00Comments on The National Championship Issue: An Ungodly Amount of Football DataUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-48284467403908606402013-02-22T18:33:45.056-05:002013-02-22T18:33:45.056-05:00Thanks for sharing your data and In a quite easy w...Thanks for sharing your data and In a quite easy way thanks to google docs and online sharing. pay per head servicehttp://www.hostpph.com/pay-per-head/index.aspxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-70448912355995226022011-10-02T20:09:58.528-04:002011-10-02T20:09:58.528-04:00Looks to me like the Team Data spreadsheet could b...Looks to me like the Team Data spreadsheet could be confusing "Fumble Returns" and "Fumble Recoveries". Looks like a lot of teams have zeroes for Fumble Recoveries, when they really didn't have any returns. But they did have recoveries (that, I guess, had no returns, or at least no reported returns).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-33484574233623837342011-07-13T11:41:36.352-04:002011-07-13T11:41:36.352-04:00Good catch, Huck - that's correct.Good catch, Huck - that's correct.Ed Guntherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17618165280932470376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-18339626838915345412011-07-13T10:52:31.183-04:002011-07-13T10:52:31.183-04:00The 2010 game data lists both teams as "vs&qu...The 2010 game data lists both teams as "vs" for Arkansas' games in Little Rock (LSU and Louisiana-Monroe). 2009 doesn't show this so I'm assuming the lines with ULM and LSU should have an "@" in Column N.Huckleberryhttp://barkingcarnival.fantake.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-57032485742042643272011-07-12T18:17:48.523-04:002011-07-12T18:17:48.523-04:00I love you, Ed.I love you, Ed.Huckleberryhttp://barkingcarnival.fantake.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-66351609097554950182011-07-11T16:25:26.608-04:002011-07-11T16:25:26.608-04:00That is really cool!
Are quarter by quarter score...That is really cool!<br /><br />Are quarter by quarter scores available from you source(s)? They are interesting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-23664529239443255112011-07-11T13:55:35.602-04:002011-07-11T13:55:35.602-04:00Good catch - fixed.Good catch - fixed.Ed Guntherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17618165280932470376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-731653098835755252011-07-11T13:07:26.608-04:002011-07-11T13:07:26.608-04:00I think there may be errors in the Team Data sprea...I think there may be errors in the Team Data spreadsheet. For example, in 2005 you have the Texas Longhorns as scoring 20 rushing TDs and 15 passing TDs. That's 35 (offensive) TD total. 35*7 = 245.<br />Their total points for the year were 652. So 652 - 245 = 407.<br /><br />They scored some TDs on defense and special Teams, but not to the total of 407 points. <br /><br />You have 2005 USC listed as scoring 5 rushing TDs. This is obviously incorrect.<br /><br />I just ran a quick check by adding all points gained from Rush TD, Pass TD, FG, all return TD, and all def. TD, and subtracting that total from the given team's total points scored. Not a single one came out at 0 (as we would expect). Some, like UT and USC are egregious (off by over 400 pts).<br /><br />So, I'm certain there are obviously some errors in the TD columns.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6793424786678923623.post-87989246136604096382011-07-11T12:36:55.535-04:002011-07-11T12:36:55.535-04:00Awesomeeeee. Thanks!Awesomeeeee. Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com