Monday, June 1, 2009

Ohio State - Oregon

Rose Bowl
January 1, 4:30pm
Pasadena, CA
Ohio State
(10-2) ____________ Big10 __________ 335.31
____
YPG = 364.8 (101%)
PPG = 29.3 (125%)
__________dYPG = 262.5 (71%) → -14%
_________dPPG = 12.2 (45%) → -39%
____
Wk Opponent oPts Score
1 Navy 127.84 W, 31-27
2 USC 227.93 L, 15-18
3 Toledo -151.64 W, 38-0
4 Illinois -190.53 W, 30-0
5 Indiana -166.84 W, 33-14
6 Wisconsin 189.12 W, 31-13
7 Purdue -27.94 L, 18-26
8 Minnesota 7.50 W, 38-7
9 New Mexico St -332.96 W, 45-0
10 Penn St 256.10 W, 24-7
11 Iowa 322.42 W, 27-24
12 Michigan -106.70 W, 21-10
Oregon
(10-2) _____________ Pac10 _________ 385.85
____
+18% ← YPG = 424.5 (119%)___________
+37% ← PPG = 37.7 (162%)___________
dYPG = 329.7 (85%)
dPPG = 23.6 (84%)
____
Wk Opponent oPts Score
1 Boise St 441.42 L, 8-19
2 Purdue -27.94 W, 38-36
3 Utah 174.96 W, 31-24
4 California 176.17 W, 42-3
5 Washington St -302.11 W, 52-6
6 UCLA 37.15 W, 24-10
8 Washington 19.13 W, 43-19
9 USC 227.93 W, 47-20
10 Stanford 199.79 L, 42-51
11 Arizona St -109.63 W, 44-21
12 Arizona 236.36 W, 44-41
14 Oregon St 189.28 W, 37-33

This would be a big win for the Bucks after all of the past bowl disappointments. They probably have a better shot in this one than any of them, but they'll have their hands full with an explosive Duck offense. Oregon has played a bit tougher of a schedule and has better losses, but Ohio State has better wins over Iowa & Penn State. This one could be a classic.

The Line: Ohio State +4.5

The Call: Oregon wins, but Ohio State covers the spread

The Result: Ohio State 26-17

And thus the Buckeyes bowl drought is over. Things obviously didn't go the way the Ducks wanted them too - the Bucks D was stellar, and the offense held the ball for over 40 minutes. Even with Oregon's quick-strike offense, less than 20 minutes on the field just isn't enough time. Ohio State came ready to play, Tressel had a gameplan that put his team in place to succeed, and they executed. Well done. Whether or not it exercises the demons remains to be seen... more on that in a week.

No comments: